The High Court of Delhi dismissed a bail application for accuseds charged with snatching and theft. Finding that material witnesses chasing the accused were yet to be examined, the Court held there were no grounds to grant bail at this stage.
Bail application dismissed; no bail granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~6
versus
THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for State.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R
Page 1 of 2
the spot with one boy who was a juvenile. One boy succeeded to run away, who was later arrested and his name was revealed as Raj Kumar @ Daku. Out of the two boys apprehended at spot, the petitioner No. 1/Dheeraj was apprehended at the spot, whereas, the petitioner No. 2 was apprehended at the instance of the petitioner No. 1
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
JULY 30, 2018
j
BAIL APPLN. 508/2018
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioners charged with snatching and theft.
Whether material witnesses' examination is required before granting bail.
DHEERAJ
RAJ KUMAR
THE STATE
MUKTA GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
