Sachin Dabas v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The single-judge Delhi High Court directed the Trial Court to expedite recording of prosecution witnesses within one year, accepting the withdrawal of the bail petition.
What did the court decide?
Discharged bail petition and directed Trial Court to conclude witness recording within one year.
What the court decided
$~12
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
| + BAIL APPLN SACHIN DAB |
. 2169/2018 AS |
..... Petitioner |
|---|---|---|
| Through | Mr. Rajiv Khosla with Ms. Prathistha Dobhal, Advocates. |
|
| versus | ||
| STATE | ..... Respondent | |
| Through | Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State with Insp. Rajeev Ranjan, SOS- II/Crime. |
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA O R D E R % 04.12.2018
- After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in case directions are issued for expeditious disposal by the Trial Court, he shall not press this petition at this stage.
- Keeping in view of the facts and circumstances of the case and the
number of witnesses remaining, the Trial Court is directed to expedite the recording of the prosecution witnesses and endeavour to conclude the same, preferably, within a period of 1 year from the next date of hearing before the Trial Court.
- In view of the above directions, learned counsel for the petitioner
seeks leave to withdraw the petition.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SACHIN DAB
- respondent
STATE
Coram
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court