Kapil Kumar v. State

$~10

• IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

• • BAIL APPLN. 2087/2018 KAPIL KUMAR ..... Petitioner

Through: Mr. Firoz Equbal Khan and Mr. Amit Kumar Pandey, Advs.

versus

STATE ..... Respondent

Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK O R D E R % 05.10.2018

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was working

with M/s Platinum Solutions whose proprietor was co-accused-Om Prakash Ray. Co-accused has already been granted bail. Petitioner is in custody for the past five and a half months. Charge-sheet has already been filed and trial is underway. Thus, it is prayed that petitioner be admitted to bail.

Learned APP submits that co-accused Om Praksh Ray has been admitted to bail since he had paid 4 lacs to the complainant. She further submits that petitioner along with co-accused had duped the complainant’s mother aged about 80 years to the tune of 39.47 lacs by alluring her that in case she invests money in LIC Pension Scheme she would get better returns. Accordingly, mother of the complainant had transferred money in the