The High Court of Delhi confirmed the interim anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C. on the same terms and conditions, noting that the matter was likely to be compromised and the petitioner had joined the investigation.
Interim anticipatory bail granted vide order dated 16.10.2017 is confirmed on the same terms and conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~4
RAHUL CHAUDHARY ..... Petitioner
Through : Mr.R.K.Tarun, Advocate with Mr.Sumit Kumar, Advocates.
versus
STATE ..... Respondent
Through : Mr.Tarang Srivastava, APP. SI Pardeep Kumar, PS Kapashera.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG O R D E R % 09.02.2018
Page 1 of 2
IPC against her husband and in-laws. The matter is likely to be compromised between the parties as per order of the Principal Judge, Family Courts, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi.
S.P.GARG, J.
FEBRUARY 09, 2018 / tr
Page 2 of 2
RAHUL CHAUDHARY
STATE
S.P. GARG
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
