The High Court of Delhi granted bail to the petitioner who was in custody for alleged forgery related to property documents, subject to furnishing a bond and a surety.
Petitioner admitted to bail on personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- and one surety in like amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~9
Through Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal, Mr. Shri Singh & Mr, Faraz Maqbool, Advs
versus
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Through Mr. Ashutosh Ghade, Adv
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK
O R D E R
% 12.10.2018
Petitioner is in custody for the past one year. Allegations against the petitioner are that out of ten properties mortgaged by him, documents of five properties were forged.
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that as per charge sheet itself, out of 20 crores, 3 crores have already been recovered. It is contended that the co-accused who are government servants, have already been granted bail; investigation is over; charge sheet has been filed; charges have been framed and trial is underway.
Keeping in mind the totality of the facts and circumstances of this case, petitioner is admitted to bail, subject to his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of `1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Only)
with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court. Bail application is disposed of in the above terms. Dasti.
A.K. PATHAK, J
OCTOBER 12, 2018 sm
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant bail to petitioner in custody for alleged property forgery.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Devinder Rastogi
Central Bureau of Investigation
A.K. Pathak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
