This order dismissed a petition for anticipatory bail. The court held that the petition is not maintainable and dismissed it because the petitioner has already been declared a proclaimed offender.
Petition dismissed as not maintainable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1# $~
Represented by: Mr. Vaibhav Jain, Advocate.
versus THE STATE ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for State with WSI Arti, PS Patel Nagar.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
Crl. M.A. No.11607/2018 (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
BAIL APPLN. 1469/2018
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
AUGUST 13, 2018/‘vn’
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition seeking anticipatory bail is maintainable when the petitioner has been declared a proclaimed offender.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Lavesh vs. State (NCT of Delhi)Referred¶13
2012 (8) SCC 730 Lavesh vs. State (NCT of Delhi) · Who else cites this
State of M.P. vs. Pradeep SharmaReferred¶13
2014 (2) SCC 171 State of M.P. vs. Pradeep Sharma · Who else cites this
Diwakar Bhati
The State
Mukta Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Mukta Gupta
Parties & counsel
