Disposed
Balbir Saran v. Atul Kumar
Delhi HCARB.P./505/2018
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioner sought arbitrator appointment under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. Court appointed former Judge Kailash Gambhir as agreed by counsel under DIAC rules.
What did the court decide?
Appointment of Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kailash Gambhir as Arbitrator under Delhi International Arbitration Centre rules.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~5
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- ARB.P. 505/2018 BALBIR SARAN ..... Petitioner Through: Ms.Mukti Choudhary and Ms.Tejaswini Chandrasekhar, Advocate with Petitioner in person.
¶4
versus
¶5
ATUL KUMAR ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Snehal Kakrania, Advocate.
¶6
CORAM:
¶7
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
¶8
- O R D E R
¶9
- % 02.08.2018
¶10
- This is a petition under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 („1996 Act‟) for appointment of an Arbitrator in the matter.
¶11
- Counsel for the respondent submits that he has no objection to the prayer made in the petition.
¶12
- Counsel for the petitioner has suggested the appointment of Hon‟ble Mr.Justice Kailash Gambhir, former Judge of this Court, as an Arbitrator.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Balbir Saran
- respondent
Atul Kumar
Coram
AI extract
Rajiv Shakdher
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court