The single judge disposed of the matter by allowing the application for withdrawal of the writ petition, dismissing the petition with liberty to approach the appropriate court.
Withdrawal of the petition allowed; petition dismissed with liberty to approach the appropriate court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~59
DR. V. A. RAMESH NATHAN ..... Petitioner
Through: Ms Tejasmi Shetty, Mr Vishakh Ranjit and Ms Sonal Sarda, Advocates.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Rajesh Gogna, CGSC for R-1 & R-2.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R
% 10.10.2018
C.M. No.42482/2018
W.P.(C) 9882/2018
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
OCTOBER 10, 2018 MK
DR. V. A. RAMESH NATHAN
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
Vibhu Bakhu
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
