Disposed

Sudhir and Anr. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Delhi HC2 Feb 2018W.P.(C)/983/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A public interest petition concerning dumping on agricultural land and road maintenance was disposed of by granting exemption, issuing notice to respond within eight weeks, and remanding the matter to the respondents for examination.

What did the court decide?

Exemption allowed subject to exceptions; notice issued; respondents directed to examine complaint and respond within eight weeks.

Sudhir and Anr. Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors. — Land Acquisition | Delhi HC (2018)

¶1

$~33

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 983/2018

¶4

SUDHIR AND ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Mohd. Sarfaraz, Advocate.

¶5

versus

¶6

GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Santosh Kumar Tripathi, ASC, GNCTD for R-1, 2 and 4. Ms Jyoti Taneja, Advocate for NDMC.

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU

O R D E R

% 02.02.2018

CM No. 4157/2018

Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶13

The application stands disposed of.

¶14

W.P.(C) 983/2018

¶15

Issue notice.

¶16

The learned counsel appearing for the respondents accepts notice.

¶17

The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia , praying as under:-

¶18

“In the facts and circumstances of the present case and in the interest of justice, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or directions thereby directing respondents no. 1 and 2 to take immediate action and to stop the conversion of arable land into residential colony and/or vest the land into gram sabha as per law the agricultural land in Mustkil No. 2, Khasra No. 11 and 20, Kamalpur Majra,

¶19

Burari, Delhi and also issue directions to respondent no. 3 who is nodal authority for the maintenance and repair of the roads to take appropriate steps to make the road no. 30 and 31 in Kamalpur Majra, Burari, Delhi clear and fit for vehicular and human movement. ”

¶20

The principal grievance of the petitioner is that malba and other construction material is being dumped on an agricultural field in Khasra No. 11 and 20 in village Burari.

¶21

The respondents shall examine the aforesaid complaint and take appropriate action if necessary. Respondent no.2 and 3 shall also treat the present petition as a representation and respond to the petitioner within a period of eight weeks from today.

¶22

In view of the above, the petition is disposed.

¶23

Order dasti .

¶24

VIBHU BAKHRU, J

¶25

FEBRUARY 02, 2018 RK

Sudhir and Anr. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sudhir and Anr. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijay Kumar Sharma Vs United India Insurance Company Ltd. & Ors.

Asian Colour Coated Ispat Limited Vs State Bank of India and Ors.

Lt. Col. Hawa Singh Jattayan (Retd.) Vs Union of India and Ors.

Shri Manoj Gupta Vs State Bank of India & Ors.

Maharaja Agrasen Hospitl Vs Delhi Police through Its Joint Commissioner(Traffic) & Ors.

Jamia Hamdard Vs South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr.

M K Gupta Vs Union of India and Ors.

Shri Kimti Lal Vs Indo Tibetan Border Police Force

Lt. Col. Hawa Singh Jattayan (Retd.) Vs Union of India and Ors.

Mahesh Syal Vs the State (Nct of Delhi) & Ors.

Bijay Kumar Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Jagan Nath Vijay Kumar & Anr. Vs Union of India & Anr.

Dr. Mohinder Kumar Vs National Human Rights Commission, New Delhi

Sukhwinder Singh Vs Union of India & Ors.