The court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous. Exemption under Section 10(23C) of the Income Tax Act was granted by an order on 7/10/2018, redressing the petitioner's grievance before hearing.
Writ petition disposed as infructuous; no substantive relief granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~39
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Prakash Kumar, Advocate
versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), NEW DELHI & ORS.
..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ashok K. Manchanda, Senior Standing Counsel for ITD CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN O R D E R
It is submitted that the petitioner’s grievance has been redressed by an order dated 7/10th December 2018, whereby the exemption under Section 10(23C) of the Income Tax Act was granted by the respondent/revenue.
In the light of the aforesaid, the writ petition is rendered infructuous and is accordingly disposed of.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
PRATEEK JALAN, J
DECEMBER 12, 2018 pkb
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition becomes infructuous due to the redressal of grievance via an order dated 7/10/2018 granting tax exemption.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ram Pyari Devi Charitable Trust
Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), New Delhi
S. Ravindra Bhat
Prateek Jalan
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
