The Court dismissed a writ petition challenging an industrial reference order. It held that the writ jurisdiction is not for fact-finding and the petitioner has an alternative remedy via the Labour Court, rendering the petition non-maintainable.
The writ petition is dismissed with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~12
+ W.P. (C) 9580/2017
M/S KANGARO INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr.Mohak Bhadana, Advocate with Mr.Ankush Diwan, Advocate.
versus
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents
Through: Ms.Riya Gulati, Advocate for R-1.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL
VINOD GOEL, J. (ORAL)
Page 1 of 3
W.P (C) 9580/2017
“Whether the services of Sh. Sudhir Kumar Rai S/o Sh. Surender Nath Rai age-37 years, (Mobile No9910258675), have been terminated illegally and/or unjustifiably by the management; and if so, to what relief is he entitled and what directions are necessary in this respect?”
Page 2 of 3
W.P (C) 9580/2017
not maintainable and the same is hereby dismissed with no order as to costs.
(VINOD GOEL) JUDGE
JANUARY 02, 2018
“shailendra”
Page 3 of 3
W.P (C) 9580/2017
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition demanding quashing of the industrial reference is maintainable when the petitioner has an alternative remedy before the Labour Court.
M/S KANGARO INDIA PVT. LTD.
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI
VINOD GOEL
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
