The High Court of Delhi dismissed the writ petition by holding that it should not be entertained as an identical issue was previously raised in W.P.(C) 10148/2017.
The writ petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~10
..... Petitioners Through : Ms. Prarthana Singh and Mr. Priyanshu Upadhyay, Advs.
AMBUJ ART ASSOCIATION AND ANR.
versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANR.
..... Respondents Through : Mr. Dhanesh Relan, SC with Ms. Komal and Ms. Gauri, Advs. for R-1/DDA Mr. Jawahar Raja, Adv. for R-2
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
O R D E R % 02.02.2018
The subject matter of this writ has already been raised before us by way of W.P.(C) 10148/2017 Saleem & Ors. v. Delhi Development Authority & Ors.
We are of the view that two writ petitions on the same subject matter cannot be entertained.
This writ petition is, therefore, dismissed.
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
FEBRUARY 02, 2018/ kr
1 issue framed by the court
Whether two writ petitions on the same subject matter can be entertained.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Saleem & Ors. v. Delhi Development Authority & Ors.Referred¶11
W.P.(C) 10148/2017 Saleem & Ors. v. Delhi Development Authority & Ors.
Ambuj Art Association and Anr.
Delhi Development Authority and Anr.
C. Hari Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
