The petitioner instructed counsel to withdraw the petition, which was accordingly dismissed along with a connected application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~22
versus
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS & INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD ..... Respondent Through Ms. Geeta Luthra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Kabir Bose, Ms. Shivani Luthra Lohiya, Ms. Sadiqua Fatma and Ms. Deepa, Advocates
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL
and he has instructions to withdraw the present petition.
CM.APPL 3841/2018 also stands dismissed.
Ms. Luthra, learned Senior Counsel who appears for the respondent, submits that for the present, the respondent does not have a nominated counsel and the information regarding hearing of this writ petition was not supplied to any of the retained counsels.
G.S.SISTANI, J
SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J
FEBRUARY 02, 2018 pst /
Abdul Rashid Butt
National Highways & Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd
G.S. Sistani
Sangita Dhingra Sehgal
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
