Petitioner sought to withdraw the petition with liberty. Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and disposed of the pending application. No substantive legal issue was decided.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~50
MINAKSHI MAHESHWARI ..... Petitioner
Through : Mr Ninad Dogra, Advocate.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr Ashim Soodm CGSC with Mr Rhythm Buaria, Advocate for R1/UOI.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R % 17.08.2018
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
AUGUST 17, 2018 pkv
MINAKSHI MAHESHWARI
UNION OF INDIA
VIBHU BAKHRU
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
