The petitioner, aggrieved by a disciplinary order reducing his pay, was brought before this Court. On the second hearing, the petitioner requested and was granted leave to withdraw the writ petition, which was then dismissed as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the petition is granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~13.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate with Ms. Santwana, Advocate with AC Rajan Kumar, CISF.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI O R D E R % 10.08.2018
Page 1 of 2
HIMA KOHLI, J
REKHA PALLI, J
AUGUST 10, 2018
na
Page 2 of 2
W.P.(C) 8379/2018
C. M. Mishra
Union of India
Hima Kohli
Rekha Palli
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
