The High Court of Delhi recalled the order restoring a writ petition pending cost payment and reinstated the earlier order dismissing the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
AKIL AHMED AND ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Ms. Bhumika, Advocate.
versus
LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR (SOUTH) AND ANR.
..... Respondents Through: Mr. Siddhharth Panda, Advocate for LAC/L&B. Mr. Arjun Pant, Advocate for DDA.
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R % 10.01.2019
dismissing the writ petition and pending applications for non prosecution stands restored.
S. MURALIDHAR, J.
SANJEEV NARULA, J.
JANUARY 10, 2019 nk
Akil Ahmed and Ors.
Land Acquisition Collector (South) and Anr.
S. Muralidhar
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
