Petitioner withdrew RTI petition regarding passenger manifest. Court dismissed petition but granted liberty to reapply via PIO or Appellate Authority by demonstrating larger public interest. Question on exemptions is reserved.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted to seek information via PIO or FAA by establishing larger public interest.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:AM UL YA
J'-
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
FEBRUARY 06,2018
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the information sought must be raised before the PIO or FAA before approaching the CIC.
Whether the petitioner can apply for information again via PIO or Appellate Authority citing larger public interest.
Whether passenger manifest constitutes 'personal information' exempt under Section 8(1)(G) of RTI Act, 2005.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner
Respondents
VIBHU BAKHRU
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
