Dismissed

Rupi Narang and Ors. v. Indian Institute of Technology

Delhi HC6 Dec 2018W.P.(C)/6900/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Delhi disposed of a writ petition filed by temporary staff of the Indian Institute of Technology, seeking regular status and benefits equivalent to those granted to their counterparts in the IRD Unit. Upon the respondent agreeing to implement salary parity, a non-functional up-gradation scheme, a pension scheme, gratuity, and physical ACRs within six weeks, the petition was withd

What did the court decide?

Disposed of; Respondent directed to provide agreed benefits including salary parity, up-gradation, NPS, and ACRs within six weeks.

Rupi Narang and Ors. Vs Indian Institute of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Delhi HC (2018)

¶1

$~7

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

W.P.(C) 6900/2017 and C.M.APPL.No. 28663/2017

¶4

RUPI NARANG AND ORS ..... Petitioners

¶5

Through Mr. A.K.Bhardwaj, Adv.

¶6

versus

¶7

INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ..... Respondent Through Mr. Arjun Mitra and Ms. Jaskaran Kaur, Advs.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT O R D E R % 06.12.2018

¶10

Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek direction directing the respondent to issue necessary order, giving same benefits to the petitioners, as have been granted to their counterparts (temporary staff) namely, Sh. Sudesh Kumar Bansal and Mrs. Anita Manchanda etc.

¶11

Petitioners further seek directions thereby directing the respondents to treat the petitioners as regular incumbents of the posts held by them or in alternate to issue the order of their regular absorption on the said post with all consequential benefits.

¶12

During the pendency of the present petition, the respondents have agreed as under:

¶13

(a)The salary related anomaly between two categories of temporary staff working in the IRD Unit should be removed

¶14

by placing the staff currently under consolidated salary on equivalent regular pay scales. Their salary should be fixed with due consideration of their total service under the IRD Unit with annual increments given at par with the staff under regular pay scales.

¶15

(b) A non-functional financial up-gradation scheme should be developed and implemented for the contractual staff working under the IRD Unit on the lines of the MACP Scheme of the Government of India.

¶16

(c)A pension scheme similar to the New Pension Scheme (NPS) of the Government of India should be developed for the contractual employees working under the IRD unit.

¶17

(d)The possibility of giving Gratuity and Leave Encashment (upto a maximum of 300 days) may also be explored and considered for these employees.

¶18

(e)Annual Confidential Reports (ACRs) be raised for all temporary staff working under IRD Unit to facilitate their performance assessment and subsequent financial upgradation / promotion whatever is possible.

¶19

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, on instructions agreed to withdraw the said petition, in view of the respondent agrees to give the benefits to the petitioners as mentioned above.

¶20

Accordingly, this petition is disposed of directing the respondent to give the benefits as mentioned above from (a) to (e) within six weeks from the receipt of this order.

¶21

Needless to state that if the counterparts of the petitioners are regularized, then the case of the petitioners shall also be taken into

¶22

consideration, at parity with the other counterparts to be regularized in future.

¶23

This petition is accordingly disposed of.

¶24

Dasti .

¶25

SURESH KUMAR KAIT, J

¶26

DECEMBER 06, 2018 gb

Rupi Narang and Ors. v. Indian Institute of Technology

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rupi Narang and Ors. v. Indian Institute of Technology

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rahul Kumar Vs South Delhi M.C.D. through D.C.M.C.D. Green Park & Ors.

Vikash Sharma Vs South Delhi M.C.D. Thorugh D.C.M.C.D. Green Park and Ors.

Sunny Vs South Delhi MCD through Dcmcd Green Park & Anr.

S K Nigam Vs Alok Mehrotra

Mahesh Chand & Ors. Vs Land Acquisition Collector & Anr.

Harpal Singh and Anr. Vs State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and Ors.

Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Ltd. Vs Union of India and Ors.

Sh. Mahesh Yadav and Ors. Vs New Delhi Municipal Council

S K Nigam Vs Alok Mehrotra

Monsanto Technology Llc Vs Controller of Patents, Delhi & Anr.

Delhi Public School Mathura Road and Anr. Vs Purmeet Bains and Anr.

Jagmohan Singh Raju Vs Union of India and Ors.

Dr. Anju Gupta Vs University of Delhi & Anr.

Abhishek Kumar Vs Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India Limited and Anr.