Petitioner sought writ relief against rejection of her alternate land plot application due to alleged filing delay. Court held delay was not sacrosanct and directed respondent to examine application without considering the delay.
Respondent directed to examine and process petitioner's application for alternate plot without considering the delay in filing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~7
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
BABITA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Sudhir Nagar and Mr Mohit Singh, Advocates.
Versus
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R % 29.11.2018
terms of the scheme for allotment of alternate plots floated by the Government of NCT of Delhi. Accordingly, she submitted her application for the same. However, there is some controversy as to whether the said application was submitted within the time specified.
respondent is directed to examine and process the petitioner’s application in accordance with law, uninfluenced of the question of any delay in filing the same.
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
NOVEMBER 29, 2018 RK
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's application for an alternate plot could be rejected solely on the ground of a 7-day delay in filing.
Whether the statutory period of one year for filing an application for allotment of an alternate plot is sacrosanct.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Government of NCT of Delhi through Secretary v. Poonam GuptaRelied on¶14
Government of NCT of Delhi through Secretary v. Poonam Gupta: 2016(154) DRJ 103 (DB)
BABITA
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI
VIBHU BAKHRU
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
VIBHU BAKHRU
Parties & counsel
