This order directs the respondents to consider the petitioner's written representation concerning the rejection of his plea for an alternate plot, requiring a reasoned order within six weeks.
Direction to respondents to consider petitioner's representation and pass a reasoned order within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~28
SURENDER ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Sunil Chaudhary, Adv. with Mr.Vijay Kasana, Adv.
versus
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Adv. with Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the petitioner had, vide his letter dated 13th July, 2017, submitted all the requisite documents as demanded by the respondents, under proper receipt, his case for alternate plot has been rejected on the ground that he had not submitted the documents sought by the respondents. He further, submits that he had submitted a detailed representation dated 1st December, 2017, requesting the respondents to re-consider his case in view of the fact that he had duly submitted all the documents demanded by the respondents.
Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that at this stage, he confines his relief to issuance of a direction to the respondents to consider his aforesaid representation and in case any further documents are needed he may be granted opportunity to
submit the same.
In view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, it is deemed appropriate to direct the respondents to consider the representation made by the petitioner and pass a reasoned order as per law, within six weeks from today. It would be open to the respondents to require the petitioner to furnish any further documents, if deemed necessary. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he can take legal recourse in accordance with law.
The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms.
REKHA PALLI, J
JANUARY 09, 2018/aa
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents are to consider the petitioner's detailed representation regarding the rejection of his alternate plot application.
Surender
Govt. of NCT of Delhi
Rekha Palli
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
