The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition challenging the rejection of a second appeal filed under the RTI Act. The petitioner sought information on undelivered mail, but the Commission held records were not maintained beyond six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~10
ADISHWAR JAIN ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr Vishal Gohri, Advocate.
versus
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSIONER
& ANR ..... Respondents
Through
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R
% 02.07.2018
CM No.25650/2018
W.P.(C) 6752/2018
petitioner and/or his family members.
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
JULY 02, 2018 MK
Adishwar Jain
Central Information Commissioner
Vibhu Bakrhu
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
