Petitioners withdrew the writ petition regarding vacancies in Delhi Higher Judiciary Services due to subsequent developments, resulting in dismissal as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~10
PAWAN KUMAR AND ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Atul Bandhu and Mr. Sharad Arya, Advocates.
versus
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AND ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Viraj R. Datar, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Sanjoy Ghose and Mr. Rhishabh Jetley, Advocates for GNCTD.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA
In view of the subsequent developments that have occurred with the publication of the advertisement for filling 11 (eleven) vacancies in the cadre of Delhi Higher Judiciary Services the petitioners do not wish to continue these proceedings.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
A. K. CHAWLA, J
FEBRUARY 07, 2018 nn
Pawan Kumar and Ors.
High Court of Delhi
And Others
S. Ravindra Bhat
A. K. Chawla
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
