The High Court of Delhi permitted the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file afresh. The petition and accompanying applications were dismissed as withdrawn upon this leave.
Permission granted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~21
SANDEEP KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. J.S. Mann, Advocate.
versus
TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT BOARD & ANR ..... Respondents Through : Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr.Sarul Jain, Advocate for R1.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
O R D E R % 22.10.2018
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file afresh.
The present writ petition and the accompanying applications are accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, J
OCTOBER 22, 2018
j
SANDEEP KUMAR
TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
