The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn on 02.07.2018, following the petitioner's counsel's motion to withdraw and seek liberty to approach the Supreme Court in a pending matter.
Petitioner granted liberty to withdraw the petition and approach the Supreme Court in pending WP (C) No.557/2017.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~03
AKHIL BHARTIYA RAILWAY KHAN PAN LECENSEES
..... Petitioner
Through Mr. V.K. Shukla and Ms. Nupur Shukla, Advocates.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondent Through Mr. Jagjit Singh, Mr. Preet Singh and Mr. Narayan Dev Parashar, Advocates for Railways.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR
O R D E R
% 02.07.2018
After some hearing, counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw the writ petition and states that, if advised, the petitioner may approach the Supreme Court in Writ Petition (Civil) No.557/2017, which is pending.
In view of and in terms of the statement made, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.
JULY 02, 2018 NA
AKHIL BHARTIYA RAILWAY KHAN PAN LECENSEES
UNION OF INDIA
SANJIV KHANNA
CHANDER SHEKHAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
