ACW granted liberty to petitioners to file fresh representation regarding promotion benefiting from recognition of academic degrees in light of Rabi Sankar Patro judgment, with time limits for respondent's adjudication.
liberty to make fresh representation with time limits for consideration by second respondent
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
versus
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, ASC and Mr. Swantk Kumar, Advocate for respondentGNCTD Mr. Karan Bharihoke, Advocate for respondentTPDDL
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
O R D E R
(ORAL)
W.P.(C) 6420/2016
Page 1 of 2
(SUNIL GAUR) JUDGE
MARCH 12, 2018 s
W.P.(C) 6420/2016
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether petitioners entitled to benefit of pending promotion after recognition of academic degrees in light of Supreme Court decision in Rabi Sankar Patro.
Whether fresh representation can be filed by petitioners and if to be adjudicated within prescribed time.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Orissa Lift Irrigation Corporation Limited v. Rabi Sankar Patro and OthersReferred¶9
Orissa Lift Irrigation Corporation Limited v. Rabi Sankar Patro and Others, (2018) 1 SCC 468 · Who else cites this
Ravi Garg & Ors
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI
GNCTD
TPDDL
Sunil Gaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
