Writ petition on waste management dismissed as matter is pending before Supreme Court and sub judice.
Writ petition dismissed; connected CM application for stay dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~26
..... Petitioner Through: Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Sr. Adv. (Amicus Curiae) with Mr. Parinay T. and Ms. Ramya, Advs. with petitioner in person. versus MINISTRY OF HOUSING AND URBAN AFFAIRS AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel for NDMC with Ms. Swagata Bhuyana and Ms. Neha Goel, Advs. for NDMC Mr. Anupam Srivastava, ASC for GNCTD with Mr. D. Gupta, Adv. for R2 Mr. Jagdeep Sharma, SC with Mr. Tushar Sannu, ASC for New Delhi Municipal Corporation. Ms. Sangeeta Chandra, Adv. for R5 Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Adv. for R1 & R3 Ms. Shweta Bharti, Adv. for R4 Mr. Jeemon Raju, Adv. for R11 Mr. Tarveen Singh Nanda, Adv. for Delhi Cantonment Board.
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
O R D E R % 09.10.2018
Considering the fact that the issue of waste management and other colateral issues involved in the writ petition is pending consideration before Hon’ble the Supreme Court in SMW(C) No. 1/2015 and the Supreme Court is monitoring the entire issue and has already appointed an Expert Committee to deal with the matter, we are not inclined to go into the matter when the matter is subjudice before the Supreme Court.
In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed.
CM. No. 24164/2018 (for stay)
Dismissed as infructuous.
CHIEF JUSTICE
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
OCTOBER 09, 2018 /aky
RAJEEV SURI
MINISTRY OF HOUSING AND URBAN AFFAIRS
V. KAMESWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
