Petition seeking allowances approved to adhoc employees. Court disposed of writ petition allowing fresh representation and directing respondent to respond within eight weeks.
Permission granted to file fresh representation; respondent directed to respond within eight weeks if relief not granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of Order: May 28, 2018
MS. BABITA AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Sriparna Chatterjee and Mr. Ajesh Luthra, Advocates
versus
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Palak Rohmetra, Advocate for Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
O R D E R (ORAL)
Page 1 of 2
W.P.(C) 5870/2018
concise and composite Representation to claim the relief as sought in this petition. Upon receiving such a Representation, second respondent shall give a speaking response thereto within a period of eight weeks, if the relief sought is not to be granted, and its fate be made known to petitioners through petitioner- Ms. Chetna Rani within two weeks thereafter, so that petitioners may avail of the remedies as available in law, if need be.
(SUNIL GAUR) JUDGE
MAY 28, 2018
s
Page 2 of 2
W.P.(C) 5870/2018
MS. BABITA AND ORS.
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS.
SUNIL GAUR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
