Petitioner sought to withdraw the present petition due to errors and requested liberty to file afresh. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn with the liberty granted and disposed of the pending application.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh; pending application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~7
NEERAJ KUMAR BIRDI ..... Petitioner
Through: Ms Simran Sonia and Mr Mahesh Kumar, Advocates.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Ravi Prakash, CGSC with Mr Farman Ali and Mr Nitish Gupta, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R % 11.10.2018
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
OCTOBER 11, 2018 MK
Neeraj Kumar Bardi
Union of India
Vibhu Bakhu
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
