Petitioner sought to withdraw a writ petition filed against HDFC Bank. The High Court of Delhi granted leave to withdraw and dismissed the petition disposed of accordingly.
Leave to withdraw petition granted; Petition dismissed and disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~17
versus
HDFC BANK LTD AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Ateev Mathur, Ms. Shilpa Thakur and Ms. Jagriti Ahuja, Advocates for the respondent bank.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA O R D E R % 21.05.2018
CAV. No. 473/2018
Mr. Ateev Mathur, learned counsel enters appearance on behalf of the caveator/respondent No.1.
The caveat is accordingly discharged.
W.P.(C) 5417/2018 & CM Nos. 20999/2018 (stay) & 21000/2018 (Exemption)
After lengthy arguments, Mr. Pallav Saxena, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition.
Leave granted.
page 1 of 2
W.P.(C) 5417/2018
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly. Pending applications also stand disposed of.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
DEEPA SHARMA, J
MAY 21, 2018 RS
page 2 of 2
W.P.(C) 5417/2018
Gurcharan Singh Sahney (Since Deceased)
HDFC Bank Ltd
Siddharth Mridul
Deepa Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
