This order dismisses a writ petition challenging the Central Information Commission's rejection of the petitioner's appeal, noting the petitioner sought queries rather than information.
None. The writ petition was dismissed and other reliefs were denied.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~67
RAJPAL P ..... Petitioner Through: Dr. Prabhas Kumar, Adv.
versus
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION AND ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Jagjit Singh with mr. Preet Singh and Mr. Narayan Dev Parashar, Advs. for Railways.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
O R D E R % 18.05.2018
CM. APPL. No.20704/2018
W.P.(C) No.5354/2018
Pg.1 of 2
W.P.(C) No.5354/2018
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
MAY 18, 2018 /pmc
Pg.2 of 2
W.P.(C) No.5354/2018
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the Central Information Commission's rejection of the appeal should be allowed.
Whether discretionary reliefs of employment generation and compensation for mental agony can be granted in these proceedings.
Rajpal P
Central Information Commission
Rajiv Shakdher
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
