Review Petition and connected application withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petition. Petitioner dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw petition and application granted with liberty to file fresh one.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~56
CYFUTURE INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Aditya Kr. Chaudhary, Mr. Gurmehar Vaan Singh, Mr.Amit Pratap Shaunak and Mr. Arjun Singh, Advocates
Versus
RAKESH KUMAR PAL AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Manish K.Bishnoi and Mr. Archit Gupta, Advocates for respondent No. 1 Mr. Saket Sikri, Advocate for respondent No. 3
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
O R D E R
% 01.02.2019
REVIEW PET. 40/2019 & CM APPL. 4952/2019
Learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition and the application with liberty to file fresh one with complete particulars.
Accordingly, this petition and the application are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.
SUNIL GAUR, J
FEBRUARY 01, 2019
v
CYFUTURE INDIA PVT. LTD.
RAKESH KUMAR PAL AND ORS.
Sunil Gaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
