The writ petition filed by Mangla Enterprises against the Commissioner, Trade & Taxes was declared infructuous and dismissed because the claim had been redressed and the amount was refunded. No substantive legal issue was addressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~22
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate
versus
COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR.
..... Respondent Through: Mr. Satykam, Additional Standing Counsel for GNCT of Delhi.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA
O R D E R
Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate, on behalf of the petitioner states that the claim in the writ has been redressed and the amount has been refunded. In these circumstances, the writ petition is rendered infructuous and accordingly dismissed .
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
A. K. CHAWLA, J
JULY 04, 2018 pkb
Mangla Enterprises
Commissioner, Trade & Taxes
S. Ravindra Bhat
A. K. Chawla
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
