Niranjan Singh Vs the State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and Ors.

¶1

$~4

¶2

*** IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI**

¶3

W.P.(C) 4903/2018

¶4

NIRANJAN SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajit Rajput, Advocate along with petitioner in person.

¶5

versus

¶6

THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) AND ORS.

¶7

….. Respondents Through: Mr. Anjum Javed, ASC along with Mr. Devendra Kumar, Mr. Faran Ahmed and Ms. Priti, Advocates with SI Bharat Lal, P.S.Hauz Khas for respondent Nos. 1 & 3/GNCTD. Mr. G.D. Mishra, Standing Counsel for respondent No. 2/SDMC. Mr. Varun Goswami and Mr. Sahil Agarwal, Advocates for respondent Nos. 4 & 5.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL O R D E R % 11.09.2018

¶9

After lengthy arguments, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, limits the relief to a direction to the South Delhi Municipal Corporation (for short ‘SDMC’), to take action against the respondent Nos. 4 & 5, who, in his view, have obtained a sanctioned plan (hereinafter referred to as ‘subject sanctioned plan’), in relation to the subject property bearing No. 85, Khasra No. 73, Yusuf Sarai, New Delhi, allegedly by furnishing forged and fabricated documents.

¶10

W.P.(C) 4903/2018

¶11

page 1 of 2

¶12

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the SDMC, invites the attention of this Court to the status report filed on their behalf to urge that, pursuant to receiving the complaint from the petitioner, in this behalf, they have issued notices to the respondent Nos. 4 & 5, to show cause, as to why, the subject sanctioned plan be not revoked.

¶13

In view of the foregoing, the present writ petition is disposed of, with a direction to the SDMC to determine the show cause notices, issued to the respondent Nos. 4 & 5, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible.

¶14

No further directions are called for in the present petition. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of.

¶15

SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J

¶16

SEPTEMBER 11, 2018 RS

¶17

page 2 of 2

¶18

W.P.(C) 4903/2018

Niranjan Singh v. the State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Niranjan Singh v. the State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bipin Chandra Vs Union of India

Waqar Ahmad Vs South Delh Municipal Corporation & Ors.

Alcatel Lucent Shanghai Bell Co. Ltd. Vs UOI and Ors.

Kic Food Products Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Vat and Ors.

Praveen Kumar Vs UOI & Ors.

Shyam Lal Vs North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr.

Pancham Chaurasia Vs North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr.

Ram Bharat Vs North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr.

Waqar Ahmad Vs South Delh Municipal Corporation & Ors.

Amit Chhikara Vs Ashim Khurana

Daily Bread Bakers Vs Monitoring Committee & Anr.

Sandesh Kumar Vs Alok Kumar Verma & Ors.

Rajesh & Anr. Vs Mohanjeet Singh & Anr.

Kela Devi Vs South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors.