Disposed

Sagar Pratap Singh v. District and Session Judge Tis Hazari (Hqs) and Ors.

Delhi HC2 May 2018W.P.(C)/4622/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenged the result of a Junior Judicial Assistant recruitment examination alleging paper leakage. Court disposed of writ petition by permitting a fresh detailed representation to the first respondent instead of examining merits.

What did the court decide?

Permission to petitioner to submit a fresh detailed representation within two weeks.

Sagar Pratap Singh Vs District and Session Judge Tis… — Landlord and Tenant | Delhi HC (2018)

¶1

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶2

Date of Order: May 02, 2018

¶3

+ W.P.(C) 4622/2018 & CM 17840/2018

¶4

SAGAR PRATAP SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. S.S. Chaudhary and Mr. Sanjay Verma and Mr. Vijay Kukreja, Advocates

¶5

versus

¶6

DISTRICT AND SESSION JUDGE TIS HAZARI (HQS) AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rajshekhar Rao and Mr. Chaitanya Puri, Advocates for respondent No.1 Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, ASC with Mr. Shwetank Singh and Ms. Urvi Mohan, Advocates for respondent-DHC

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR

¶8

O R D E R

¶9

(ORAL)

¶10

An examination was conducted by Office of the District & Sessions Judge (HQ), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi for recruitment to the post of Junior Judicial Assistant (Group ‘C’) and petitioner had participated in the said examination and upon being unsuccessful, by way of this petition, petitioner has now challenged the result of the said examination declared on 24^th March, 2018. Allegations of malpractice/unfair means have been levelled. The basis of this writ petition appears to be a rumour

¶11

W.P.(C) 4622/2018

¶12

Page 1 of 2

¶13

that the question-paper was leaked through the employees of the Delhi District Courts and one coaching centre in Sonepat, Haryana.

¶14

By way of this petition, an inquiry is sought in respect of the examination in question with an alternate prayer that the said examination be re-conducted. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that a Representation (Annexure P-9) was made to this Court on 2^nd April, 2018, with a copy to the District & Sessions Judge (HQ), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi and the fate of the said Representation is yet not known.

¶15

In the facts and circumstances of this case, it is deemed appropriate that instead of entertaining this petition on merits, to dispose of this petition with permission to petitioner to now make a fresh and detailed Representation to first respondent within a period of two weeks from today. Upon receipt of such a Representation, first respondent shall consider it and give a speaking response thereto, within a period of twelve weeks and convey its fate to petitioner within a week thereafter, so that petitioner may avail of the remedies as available in law, if need be. 4. With aforesaid directions, this petition and the application are disposed of.

¶16

Copy of this order be given dasti to counsel for the parties.

¶17

(SUNIL GAUR) JUDGE

MAY 02, 2018

W.P.(C) 4622/2018

Page 2 of 2

Sagar Pratap Singh v. District and Session Judge Tis Hazari (Hqs) and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sagar Pratap Singh v. District and Session Judge Tis Hazari (Hqs) and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bilt Graphic Paper Products Ltd. Vs Dbs Bank Ltd. & Anr.

Ultimate Fashion Maker Vs Commissioner of Value Added Tax & Anr.

Kansin Import Export Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Value Added Tax & Anr.

Hardial Singh Chauhan Vs Union of India and Anr.

Raj Kapoor Vs University of Delhi & Anr.

Jai Prakash Vs D.T.C.& Anr.

K.K.Dhawan Vs Export Credit Gurantee Corp. of India Ltd. & Ors.

Mangt. of D.T.C. Vs Jai Prakash

Ms. Jyoti Vs State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and Anr.

Ram Karan Vs Union of India & Anr.

Sanghamitra Mohanty Vs Hscc (India) Limited and Anr.

Mohd Aliyas & Ors. Vs Reliance Insurance Co. Ltd.

Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs Md. Illiyas & Ors.

Dr. Lipi Biswas Sen Vs Registrar, Jawaharlal Nehru University and Anr.