Dismissed
Vijay Kumar Babbar v. C.B.S.E. & Ors.
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/4350/2001
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
A writ petition was dismissed by default as neither parties nor their counsel appeared before the court on the date of hearing.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~7
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- W.P.(C) 4350/2001 VIJAY KUMAR BABBAR ..... Petitioner Through: None
¶4
versus C.B.S.E. & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: None
¶5
- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR O R D E R
¶6
- % 18.01.2018
¶7
There is no appearance on behalf of the parties. Even on the last date of hearing, none was present on their behalf.
¶8
Accordingly, petition is dismissed for default and non prosecution.
¶9
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
¶10
JANUARY 18, 2018 neelam
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Vijay Kumar Babbar
- respondent
C.B.S.E. & Others
Coram
AI extract
C. Hari Shankar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court