The High Court of Delhi dismissed the petition for non-prosecution based on the respondent's statement that no damage was noticed and excavation was nearly complete without a JCB.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution; pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~34
RUPA BHATTACHARYA & ANR ..... Petitioners
Through: None. versus SHO C R PARK POLICE STATION & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr Rakesh Sharma, Advocate for R- 2. Mr Dibyadyuti Banerjee, Advocate for R-3. Mr Rishikesh Kumar, ASC with Mr Premsagar Pal and Mr Vikash Saini, Advocates for GNCTD. SI Anil Kumar, PS C. R. Park.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
AUGUST 23, 2018/MK
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition for relief regarding property damage should be maintained.
Rupa Bhattacharya & Anr
SHO C R Park Police Station & Ors
Vibhu Bakhu
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
