Petitioner filed a writ petition seeking quashing of certain letters issued by the respondent. Court adjourned for hearing and recorded assurances of no coercive action pending final order.
No relief granted; matter adjourned for hearing with directions to appear on fixed date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~45
DELHI PAPER PRODUCTS CO. PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohit Gupta and Mr. D. Soni, Advs.
versus
SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS .... Respondents Through: Mr. V. Madhukar, Adv. for R1 Ms. Shobhana Takiar, Adv. for R2 & R3 Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Standing Counsel for BSES with Mr. Arnav Vidyarthi, Adv. for R4
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the
following prayers:
“It is, therefore, respectfully prayed that this Hon‟ble Court may be pleased to:
dated 26.03.2018 issued by respondent No.1 to respondent Nos.4 & 5; and / or
During the course of hearing, my attention has been drawn to the
communication dated April 24, 2018 of the SDMC which is a response to a representation dated April 03, 2018 given on behalf of the petitioner seeking a personal hearing. The said request was acceded to vide the said letter and April 27, 2018 was fixed for personal hearing. It is noted as the concerned representative of the petitioner was out of station, the SDMC was called upon to re-fix the date of personal hearing between May 01, 2018 to May 05, 2018.
Mr. Mohit Gupta states, representative of the petitioner shall appear before the concerned Officer on any date as fixed by the Court. This submission is acceptable to the learned counsel for the respondent SDMC. Accordingly, the representative of the petitioner shall appear before the Additional Deputy Commissioner (Factory Licensing) on May 07, 2018 at 11:00 A.M., on which date the concerned Officer of the respondents shall
give a hearing to the representative of the petitioner and pass order in accordance with law. If the petitioner is still aggrieved with the said order,
liberty shall be with the petitioner to seek such remedy as available in law.
Learned counsel for the respondents on instructions states, till such
time the order is passed, no coercive action shall be taken. The statement is
taken on record. The petition is disposed of.
CM No. 15535/2018 (for stay)
Dismissed as infructuous.
Dasti under the signature of the Court Master to the counsel for the
parties.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
MAY 02, 2018 /aky
DELHI PAPER PRODUCTS CO. PVT. LTD.
SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
V. KAMESWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
