The petitioners sought leave to withdraw the writ petition. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn. No substantive order or principle of law was laid down.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~55
SAURABH CHAWLA & ORS ..... Petitioners Through : Mr. Ashutosh Gupta and Mr. Gaurav Rana, Advs.
versus
..... Respondents Through : Mr. Ravi Prakash, CGSC with Mr. Farman Ali, Adv.
UNION OF INDIA & ANR
CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
O R D E R % 20.04.2018
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for leave to withdraw this writ petition and applications. The same are dismissed as withdrawn.
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
APRIL 20, 2018/ kr
Saurabh Chawla & Ors
Union of India & Anr
C. Hari Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
