The disposal order directs the respondents to calculate interest and remit VAT refund based on the Supreme Court's decision in Vizien Ogranics, thereby disposing of the writ petition.
Direction to calculate interest and remit VAT refund amount per Supreme Court direction; Writ petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~28
AADI OVERSEAS ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Nitin Gulati, Adv.
versus
COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Shadan Ferasat, ASC with Mr. Ahmed Said, Adv.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
It is submitted by the petitioner that the relief claimed has been granted in the form of VAT refund.
Accordingly, the respondents shall calculate the interest and remit the amount in terms of the Supreme Court’s decision in Commissioner, Trade and Taxes & Anr. v. Vizien Ogranics (Civil Appeal No.242/2018).
The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
PRATEEK JALAN, J
NOVEMBER 13, 2018/ akv
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Commissioner, Trade and Taxes & Anr. v. Vizien OgranicsReferred¶11
_Commissioner, Trade and Taxes & Anr. v. Vizien Ogranics_ (Civil Appeal No.242/2018)
AADI OVERSEAS
COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR.
S. Ravindra Bhat
Prateek Jalan
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
