The petitioner sought admission for her son. The school verified entitlement and assured admission in Nursery under OBC category. The court disposed of the petition as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
versus
DY. DIRECTOR (EDUCATION) AND ORS.
..... Respondent Through Ms.Hetu Arora Sethi with Mr.Abhimanyu Verma, Advs for R-1 & 2. Mr.Kamal Gupta with Ms.Tripti Gupta, Advs for R-3.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI
O R D E R
% 02.05.2018
Pursuant to the last order dated 20.04.2018, Mr. Kamal Gupta, learned counsel for the respondent no.3/school informs the Court that, the respondent no.3 has conducted the requisite verification and found that the petitioner’s son is entitled to be granted admission. He also assures the Court that the petitioner’s son would be granted admission in Nursery under OBC category for the academic year 2018-19 within one week from today.
In view of the aforesaid statement made by the learned counsel for the respondent no.3, the learned counsel for the petitioner does not wish to press the present petition.
The petition alongwith pending application is disposed of as not pressed.
REKHA PALLI, J
MAY 02, 2018/ sr
Neelam Rani Kharb
DY. Director (Education)
School
Rekha Palli
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
