Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition. The court granted leave and dismissed the writ petition and connected M.A. as withdrawn with liberty to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal.
Leave granted to withdraw; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach CAT.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~33
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
FORANTI MEENA ..... Petitioner
Through Mr. M. Vinod Kumar, Advocate.
versus
GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr. N.K. Singh, proxy counsel for Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat,Advocate for R-1 & R-2.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL
O R D E R % 13.04.2018
Counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal.
Accordingly, the writ petition as well as CM APPL 14221/2018 is dismissed as withdrawn with leave as prayed.
G.S.SISTANI, J
SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J
APRIL 13, 2018 ck/
Foranti Meena
Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
G.S. Sistani
Sangita Dhingra Sehgal
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
