The court disposed of both the writ petition and an application seeking direction for police cooperation, noting the official respondent's bounden duty to assist the investigation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~48
PUNEET SHARMA & ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Puneet Sharma, Advocate.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Suparna Srivastava, CGSC with Mr. Tushar Mathur, Advocate, for R-1.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
%
O R D E R 12.03.2018
CM APPL.9381/2018
W.P. (C) 2866/2015
shall stand cancelled.
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
MARCH 12, 2018 / vikas /
PUNEET SHARMA & ANR.
UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
RAJIV SHAKDHER
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
