Allowed

M R Institute of Education v. National Council for Teacher Education & Anr.

Delhi HC22 Mar 2018W.P.(C)/2801/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Delhi allowed a writ petition praying for reconsideration of a recognition application for conducting the D.El.Ed. course, directing the respondent to process it within twelve weeks and not to reject it based on a State ban.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition allowed; application to reconsider the petitioner's 2012 application and dispose within twelve weeks with deposit of Rs. 20,000/-.

M R Institute of Education Vs National Council for… — Education and Admissions | Delhi HC (2018)

¶1

$~48

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 2801/2018

¶4

M R INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Sanjay Sharawat & Mr.Divyank Rana, Advs.

¶5

versus

¶6

NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR

¶7

..... Respondents Through: Ms.Monika Arora, Adv.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI

¶10

O R D E R

¶11

% 22.03.2018

¶12

Vide the present petition, the petitioner/Institute has prayed for a direction to the respondent to reconsider its application dated 31.12.2012 for the grant of recognition to conduct D.El.Ed. course, which was returned by respondent No.2 vide letter dated 03.07.2013.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that the said application was returned unactioned only on the ground of the ban imposed by the State of Haryana for opening of new institutes for the D.El.Ed. course during that period.

¶14

Issue notice. Ms.Monika Arora, Advocate who appears on advance notice for the respondents fairly submits that the respondents have taken a decision to process all the applications which were submitted by the Institutes before the imposition of the ban by the State Government.

¶15

Learned counsel for the respondent, however, submits that keeping in view the fact that the petitioner’s application was returned over 4 years ago, the respondents may be given adequate time to examine and process the same as per law.

¶16

Subject to petitioner’s depositing Rs.20,000/- with Delhi High Court Staff Welfare Fund, the writ petition is allowed. Subject to the petitioner meeting all other prescribed eligibility criteria, the respondents are directed to reconsider the petitioner’s application dated 31.12.2012 and dispose of the same by passing a reasoned and speaking order within twelve weeks from today. It is made clear that the petitioner’s application would not be rejected on the ground of there being a ban imposed by the State of Haryana for opening of such educational Institutions.

¶17

The petition stands disposed of with the above directions.

¶18

REKHA PALLI, J

¶19

MARCH 22, 2018 gm

M R Institute of Education v. National Council for Teacher Education & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M R Institute of Education v. National Council for Teacher Education & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shiv Shankar Gupta Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Shiv Shankar Gupta Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Board of Higher Secondary Education, Delhi through Its Secretary Vs NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Rajesh Kumar Jha Vs Central Railside Warehouse Company Limited

Yoshi & Ors. Vs Esic & Ors.

P K Singh Vs National Insurance Company Limited & Anr.

Alka Lamba Vs Union of India, Ministry of Law and Justice and Ors.

Kailash Gahlot & Ors. Vs Election Commission of India & Ors.

Board of Higher Secondary Education, Delhi through Its Secretary Vs NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Ch. Deep Chand College of Education Vs National Council for Teacher Education and Anr.

Master Aayush Sharma (Minor) Vs the Director of Education & Anr.

Mr. Kshitiz Kumar Vs the Lt. Governor of Gnct and Ors.

Dr Vanitha R Vs Ministry of Ayush & Anr.

Maa Ganga College of Education Vs National Council for Teacher Education & Anr.