Petitioner sought to withdraw a writ petition with liberty to file a fresh one due to errors. The High Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn and closed all pending applications.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition; pending applications closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~62
+ W.P. (C) 2747/2018, CM APPL.11180-11181/2018
VIJENDER GUPTA AND ORS. ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Yuvraj Sharma, Ms. Rajul Jain and Mr. Balendu Shekhar, Advocates.
versus
GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .... Respondents Through: Mr. Sameer Vashisht, Advocate for R- 1&2.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
%
O R D E R 21.03.2018
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
MARCH 21, 2018 / vikas /
Vijender Gupta and ors.
Government of NCT of Delhi and ors.
Rajiv Shakdher
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
