Disposed

Mmtc Ltd. v. M/S Glitter Overseas & Ors.

Delhi HC18 Jan 2018O.M.P.(T)/27/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Delhi disposed of a petition filed by MMTC Ltd. under Sections 14 and 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Following the resignation of the presiding arbitrator and citing delays, the court terminated the mandate of the earlier tribunal and appointed Mr. Rakesh Kapoor as the sole arbitrator.

What did the court decide?

Termination of the earlier tribunal and appointment of Mr. Rakesh Kapoor, Retired District Judge, as sole arbitrator.

Mmtc Ltd. Vs M/S Glitter Overseas & Ors. — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2018)

¶1

$~26

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(T) 27/2015

¶3

MMTC LTD.

¶4

..... Petitioner

¶5

Through : Mr.Ashok Chhabra, Advocate.

¶6

versus

¶7

M/S GLITTER OVERSEAS & ORS.

¶8

..... Respondents Through : Mr.Kishore M Gajaria and Ms.Namrata Chadha, Advocates.

¶9

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA

¶10

O R D E R

¶11

% 18.01.2018

¶12

This petition under Section 14 & 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred as ‘the Act’) has been filed by the petitioner for terminating the mandate of earlier tribunal and appointment of new arbitral tribunal.

¶13

The facts leading to the filing of this petition are as under:a) On 05.01.2009 two arbitrators i.e. Shri D.B. Lall and Sh.K.T.S. Tulsi, senior advocate appointed Justice Mr. C.L. Chaudhary (Retd) as the presiding arbitrator, which commenced the proceedings on 16.01.1999.

¶14

b) On 24.09.1999 the claimants filed their statement of claim. And from May 2002 to March 2007 the proceedings were pending for filing of the rejoinder.

¶15

c) On 06.03.2007 the claimant filed the affidavit of evidence in April, 2007 and case was adjourned to 18.04.2007. Thereafter, till 30.11.2007 the matter was adjourned on account of non-availability of the one arbitrator or the other. The arbitral proceedings could not be conducted till 22.03.2011 for one reason or the other.

¶16

d) Since 22.03.2011 no hearing had taken place and on 29.11.2013 due to ill health of Justice C.L.Chaudhary (Retired) suggestion is for other presiding arbitrator. However, on 05.02.2014, the petitioner received a communication that Justice C L Chaudhary (Retired) has resigned and new chairman has to be nominated and petitioner suggested few names for appointment, but no reply has been received from the respondent; hence the present petition.

¶17

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of resignation of Justice C L Chaudhary (Retired), new presiding officer has to be nominated. It is also submitted that remaining two arbitrators namely Shri D.B. Lall and Sh.K.T.S.Tulsi, senior advocate owing to their present engagement have no time to conduct the arbitral proceedings as such while terminating the mandate of earlier arbitral tribunal, any retired District Judge be appointed as sole arbitrator which would certainly reduce the cost factors.

¶18

The learned counsel for the respondent concedes to the appointment of sole arbitrator and termination of the mandate of earlier tribunal.

¶19

In the circumstances while terminating the mandate of earlier arbitral tribunal, Mr.Rakesh Kapoor, (Mobile No.9910384621) Retired District Judge is appointed as the sole arbitrator to adjudicate

¶20

the dispute between the parties. The arbitration shall take place under the aegis of DIAC and the arbitration fees shall be in terms of the DIAC Rules. Parties to appear before the learned arbitrator on 24.01.2018 at 11.30AM.

¶21

In above terms, the petition stands disposed of.

¶22

YOGESH KHANNA, J

¶23

JANUARY 18, 2018 M

Mmtc Ltd. v. M/S Glitter Overseas & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mmtc Ltd. v. M/S Glitter Overseas & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prerna Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Vs India Tourism Development Corporation Limited & Anr.

Nagarjuna Agrichem Limited Vs the Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.

Cobra Instalaciones Y Servicios, Sa Vs Kec International Ltd.

M/S Ccc Builders Merchant Private Limited Vs Container Corporation of India Limited

Inderjit Badhwar Vs M/S Tara Press & India Research Press

Coastal Marine Construction & Engineering Ltd. Vs Gypsum Structural India Pvt. Ltd.