Haryana Ship Breakers Ltd. v. UOI and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C)…
What did the court decide?
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~19
versus
UOI AND ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Akshay Hakhjya, CGSC. Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Sr. Standing Counsel for Customs(CBEC) with Mr. Abhishek Gahi and Ms. Anumita Chandra, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR
O R D E R % 13.02.2018
None appears for the petitioner. Mr. Rajesh Rawal, Advocate states that he was earlier appearing for the petitioner in the present writ petition but now does not have any instruction.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.
FEBRUARY 13, 2018 MR/pk
Haryana Ship Breakers Ltd
Union of India and Anr
Sanjiv Khanna
Chander Shekhar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court