Ms Shoes East Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C)…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~35
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Anumita Chandra, Advocate
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition and states that he would file a fresh writ petition enclosing relevant papers and documents. Pleadings would appropriately indicate why the order dated 25.8.2017 requires interference in exercise of power of judicial review.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed. CM No.10603/2018 is also dismissed as withdrawn.
SANJIV KHANNA, J
CHANDER SHEKHAR, J
MARCH 19, 2018 tp
MS SHOES EAST LTD
UNION OF INDIA
Sanjiv Khanna
Chander Shekhar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court