The High Court of Delhi dismissed the writ petition and connected CM application for non-prosecution due to the petitioner's absence and lack of interest in pursuing the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~41
HARI CHAND ..... Petitioner
Through None
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents Through Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Advocate
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL
O R D E R
% 19.04.2018
Steps have not been taken to bring the legal representatives of the deceased petitioner on record. None is present on behalf of the petitioner despite the matter being passed over once and called a second time. It seems that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition.
The writ petition and CM.APPL 10112/2017 are dismissed for nonprosecution.
G.S.SISTANI, J
SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J
APRIL 19, 2018 pst /
Hari Chand
Union of India & Anr
G.S. Sistani
Sangita Dhingra Sehgal
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
