The petitioner was granted relief but the order dismissed the petition as the subject matter matter had been settled by issuing a fresh Banker's cheque, which was confirmed received by the petitioner.
Writ petition and connected CM disposed of as satisfied.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~9
TAJADUKE KHAN ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Ashutosh Dixit, Advocate.
versus
THE SUB-DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE/DISTRICT COLLECTION OFFICER & ANR ..... Respondents
Through: Mr.Naushad Ahmed Khan, ASC for GNCTD.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL O R D E R % 11.01.2018
CM No. 23629/2015
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that they have issued a fresh Banker’s cheque bearing no. 585434 dated 05.01.2018 for Rs.2,75,189/- issued by State Bank of India, Delhi and handed over the same to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner confirms having received the said banker’s cheque from the respondent.
Both the learned counsel submit that with the issuance of the fresh banker’s cheque nothing survives in the petition.
CM and the petition stand disposed of as satisfied.
VINOD GOEL, J.
JANUARY 11, 2018
“shailendra”
Tajaduke Khan
The Sub-Divisional Magistrate/District Collection Officer & Anr
Vinod Goel
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
