Writ petitions were dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner citing typographical errors, with liberty to file fresh petitions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~51 & 59
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) 2169/2018
| LOKBETA PH | ARMACEUTI | CAL | INDIA |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVT. LTD. | ..... Petitioner | ||
| Through : | Mr. | Priyadarshi Manish, | |
| versus | Ms. Ms. Mr. |
Anjali J. Manish, Nidhi Saini and Aditya Vikram Singh, Advs. |
|
| UNION OF IN | DIA & ORS. Through : |
Mr. 4. |
.... Respondents Kirtiman Singh, ASC for R-1 to |
| Mr. | Sanjeev Narula, CGSC with Mr. | ||
| Abh | ishek Ghai, Adv. for R-5. |
+ W.P.(C) 2183/2018 LOKBETA PHARMACEUTICAL INDIA PVT. LTD.
| ..... Petitioner | |
|---|---|
| Through : | Mr. Priyadarshi Manish, |
| Ms. Anjali J. Manish, | |
| Ms. Nidhi Saini and | |
| Mr. Aditya Vikram Singh, Advs. | |
| versus |
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Kirtiman Singh, ASC for R-1 to 4. Mr. Sanjeev Narula, CGSC with Mr. Abhishek Ghai, Adv. for R-5.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
O R D E R
% 09.03.2018
for.
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
MARCH 09, 2018 mk
Lokbeta Pharmaceutical India Pvt. Ltd.
Union of India
Rajiv Shakdher
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
